The brewing war over ad filtering

... and content modification.

It seems like the war for content control (DRM, implicit EULAs, DeCSS, PVRs, ...) is increasingly extending from the music and movie industry to the internet.

Services built on top of other sites generate a good portion of the conflicts: sites with deep-linking policies, lawyers restricting how their RSS can be redistributed or simply, general questions about copyright and caching/proxying/quoting/converting...

But the client (browser) is also a major friction point, because of its ability to modify the content, as illustrated in the debate over Microsoft's SmartTags and Google's AutoLinks.
Advertisement filtering is just a variation on the usual conflict between content producers or users, and many of the classic arguments apply. It's only more sensitive because ads are the revenue source for many websites.


Ad-blocking can takes many forms. Some browsers support it through built-in popup-blocking or user specified CSS. Extensions can also add the functionality: for example, the various browser toolbars, the AdBlock extension for Firefox, or some ad-hiding extensions for MSN Messenger.
Proxies can also be used to filter out ads (one of our CS assignments was such a filtering proxy). Some go even as far as replacing the ads with more ads.
Of course, there is always the low tech filtering approach: developping ad blindness.

Up to now, popups have been the center of attention, with annoyed users trying to block them and advertisers attempting to circumvent the blocking techniques (which certainly doesn't win them any love from users). But as the various other means of blocking ads become more popular, content providers are going to try and regain control.

Google's text ads (AdSense) are certainly less annoying than many (they still use some screen estate) but even they can be filtered out from most sites by tools like AdBlock. How long until Google goes after AdBlock or implements workarounds?
Digging more into the legal aspect of ad filtering could also be an option.

Will content providers start spreading the "unskippable" DVD scene or "forwarding forbidden" TV shows phenomenon on the web in the form of interstitial ad pages?
Will more content be made available on the web in flash, pdf, closed, obfuscated or DRMed formats? Will we see pirated copies of blogs and other websites, distributed thru the darknet?
One interesting factor is the democratization of publishing. Everyone is now a potential content provider. Is that going to change the balance?

Update (2005/04/03): Matt from "Peer Pressure" has a good post on the multiple personality disorder of the blogosphere, conflicted between desire for control as a user and control as an author: on one hand bloggers cheer for RSS and user scripts; and on the other hand many freaked out with AutoLink.

Posted by Julien on March 01, 2005. Permalink
Comments
comments powered by Disqus

Check out the content-modifying FF extension, Greasemonkey:
http://greasemonkey.mozdev.org
and the related user scripts directory (chock full of ad-strippers) here:
http://dunck.us/collab/GreaseMonkeyUserScripts

Posted by: Jeremy Dunck at March 9, 2005 09:07 PM

Thanks for the pointer Jeremy. I heard about it, although I haven't installed it yet ;-)

Posted by: Julien at March 10, 2005 12:15 AM

Yes, Greasemonkey rocks.

I see a post-Google world where folksonomies dominate information management. I have this dream where everyone produces content because creation is fulfilling, and not for money. I have a vision that the web will rise up worldwide and send spammers of all shapes and sizes to Saudi Arabia (or maybe Texas) to be beheaded.

Posted by: Barry at March 16, 2005 12:15 PM

Barry, that's a beautiful dream man. Now... what can we do to make it true? ;-)

Posted by: Trav at March 16, 2005 06:03 PM

Hey, I'm in Texas, and we're not all Bushie here. SXSW is here, ya know? ;)

I sincerely hope Greasemonkey (and user scripts in general) don't kill advertising. I think it is an important facilitator of free speech. We will be impoverished if sites close because people can't be bothered to download tasteful text ads and gifs.

As Trav says, there must be some substitute business model before kill advertising becomes acceptable.

Posted by: Jeremy Dunck at March 18, 2005 04:37 PM

AdBlock is still probably better than Greasemonkey for pure ad-blocking. But when it comes to skipping interstitial pages, Greasemonkey rocks.

Posted by: Julien Couvreur at November 10, 2005 02:27 PM
Trackbacks
All Kinds of Greasemonkey Goodness
Excerpt:

Two great developments are available that build on the Greasemonkey tool for the Firefox browser. Platypus allows you to modify a web page from your brows


Weblog: Bill Katz
Tracked: June 3, 2005 01:30 PM