Curiosity is bliss

if you add:
this.addGlobalStyle('#content { width: 800px }');

below the others, it makes it look much better.

Thanks for the tip Sam. Included the change.

no prob.
i just got greasemonkey and i'm hooked.

are you able to get rid of the ad on the top?

and

this.addGlobalStyle('#sidebar-a { display: none ! important }');
why doesn't this work on the archives:
http://boingboing.net/2003_01_01_archive.html

Good catch, I never went to the archives. And I couldn't see the top banner, because it was already AdBlocked.

Both of these seem tricky to target and hide. The banner don't have any specific ID, CLASS or NAME attribute. Same thing with the sidebar on the right, for the archives page.
I'll try some more tricks.

am i allowed to edit your code to work with other sites and release it? (giving you credit and such)

Of course, it's GPL. Plus you have the source anyways (and it's not much code too...).

"Could we use this to bring Google auto-completion to the main Google search page? or add more integration between the various Google services (search, mail, maps,...)?"

yes, quite easily. should be as simple as grabbing the existing script, throwing it into a .user.js file, and making a few dom-edits.

"Could this be used to create some in-page annotation using del.icio.us or wikis? or would javascript/domain restrictions prevent that?"

An upcoming GM version will have a way around the domain restrictions. It could be done today if either of those services provided a javascript-style API to their service ala Google Suggest (because javascript files are not subjected to the same-domain policy the way XML files are).

"Create an easy way to find GreaseMonkey scripts for a site that you're at. It would search, list and describe all the useful customizations that you could apply to the site. Can this be done by re-using the existing search engines, using a distributed approach (FOAF, a file type or a standard url format?), instead of creating a dedicated directory site with a "search by site" functionality? "

I wanted to do this originally by file type, but none of the major search engines can find ".user.js" files because they are overwhelmed by references to the user.js file that is part of mozilla. Unfortunate.

Jeremy dunck, who created the Greasemonkey archive wiki, wants to extend it so that people can thumb-up or thumb-down scripts. This could help head-off possible XSS security problems.

We'll have to do something like this at some point, I'd imagine.

"Create an easy way to find GreaseMonkey scripts for a site that you're at. It would search, list and describe all the useful customizations that you could apply to the site. Can this be done by re-using the existing search engines, using a distributed approach (FOAF, a file type or a standard url format?), instead of creating a dedicated directory site with a "search by site" functionality?"

I think you'd need to have a dedicated directory site *somewhere*, but it could be something as simple as http://del.icio.us/tag/greasemonkey+[sitename], if that were an agreeable convention.

Please take this discussion to the mailing list, where I've just sent a message on the topic.
http://greasemonkey.mozdev.org/list.html

Subject is "Directory service".

Thanks Jeremy. Just subscribed ;-)

Can you make it get rid of all of Xeni's posts?

I've been thinking about doing something similar with a proxy. I love it. Way to give Cory a taste of his own medicine. The content wants to be free!

Contrary to Pedro's rather *rude* comments -- I think Xeni's posts are quite excellent. I believe an apology is in order.

However, with regards to content, perhaps it might be more resource-optimal to parse and strip adds from the RSS feed, and then rebuild the content, instead of stripping stuff directly from the HTML page.

At the *very* least, you'd be saving the authors a bunch of bandwidth, which is the real reason for the ads in the first place...I mean, removing ads are fine as a technical tour-de-force, but you must realize that you are effectively preventing Cory from recieving advertising revenue and effectively styming him from keeping the site alive -- I mean, consider what Cory would have to do if every single BB reader decided to do this?

Aurelius, that's the point.
Do you think that Mark's "Google Butler", that BoingBoing was advertising and which removes the Ads and inserts links to its competitors, makes Google any money?

I personally think that many of Xeni's posts are excellent, but some are to much for work. So I wrote a script to remove hers...

I like Xeni and hope she takes no offence, this just allows me to view BoingBoing at work...

http://sweb.uky.edu/~jdandr2/greasemonkey/de-Xeni.user.js

Jesse, I was going to try and implement a similar approach, for some fun, but you beat me to it ;-)
On the other hand, I added a user script for skipping IGN's annoying interstitial ad pages (see GreaseMonkey wiki for the url).

Thank you, Jesse.

Or just use this page and filter boingboing to your heart's content

here's the page:

http://dialedin.us/boing/

Julien,
In case you didn't notice, my site (69.90.152.144 which you commented on before) now has a domain name. It's http://dunck.us/anabasis/ ;-)

Google Suggest greasemonkey extention from Adrian Holovaty here:
http://www.holovaty.com/blog/archive/2005/03/19/1826

WELL i hate xeni and i use Jesse's script and love it. Add the BoingBoing Butler and BoingBoing is now almost 100% readable.

Can someone make a script that removes all Cory's posts with the word "Cory" in it? I know Cory is blogs about himself because nobody else will, but that doesn't mean i have to read it. "DRM" would be a good keyword too.

When using BoingBoing butler and clicking the back button the whole browser closes.

Example:
http://www.boingboing.net/2005/05/11/funny_photo_on_craig.html

Click on the image, and then try to return to the original page by clicking the back button.

I am using Firefox 1.0.4

The BoingButler script is amazing. It also raises the question, "what good is a creative commons license if your content is so layered with advertising that it gets unreadable?"

All the marxists become New Economists when the cash registers start ringing. And I would too. And so would you.

Also, this post originally had the word social*st, but the spam filter didn't like the word c-i-a-l-i-s

Priapic Marxists, unite!

How about a GM script to remove Cory's posts about Disneyland?

Am I the only one for whom this script stopped working today? :(

It's still working for me.

http://gutterfish.com/wwwboard/messages/42.htm higherloosertaste